PL EN
REVIEW PAPER
SCANNING AND OTHER NON-INVASIVE MEASURES OF DIPLOMATIC POST CONTROL IN THE LIGHT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna im. Jarosława Dąbrowskiego w Warszawie
 
 
Publication date: 2011-12-01
 
 
SBN 2011;1(1): 385-400
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The article tries to answer the question about the admissibility of non-invasive control of diplomatic mail in the light of international law. Diplomatic and consular law has been codified in four UN conventions. Each of these documents contains provisions defining the status of diplomatic or consular mail and their means of transport. Attention is also drawn to one more important document prepared by the UN International Law Commission, namely the 1989 draft on the status of a diplomatic courier and diplomatic mail sent without the participation of a courier. However, this document has not yet taken on and will probably not take the form of an international agreement. The author tries to show that the formula adopted in the Vienna Convention of 1961 does not exclude the use of non-invasive means of controlling diplomatic mail. It also points to the controversial nature of Art. 28 of the UN KPM draft, which is one of the main reasons why this document did not go beyond the stage of the draft international agreement.
 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
J.F. ADDICOTT, The Status Of The Diplomatic Bag: A Proposed United States Position,“Houston Journal of International Law”, vol. 13, nr 2 z 1991.
 
2.
P.G. BARULIN, Status diplomaticzieskoj poczty i diplomaticzieskogo kuriera, „SovietYear-book of International Law” 1983, Moskwa 1984.
 
3.
J. CRAIG BARKER, The Abuse of Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities. A NecessaryEvil?, Aldershot  Brookfield USA  Singapore  Sydney 1996.
 
4.
W. CZAPLIŃSKI, A. WYROZUMSKA, Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnieniasystemowe, Wyd. 2, Warszawa 2004.
 
5.
E. DENZA, Diplomatic Law. A Commentary on the Vienna Convention on DiplomaticRelations, 2nd ed., Oxford 1998.
 
6.
E. DENZA, Diplomatic Law. Commentary on the Vienna Convention on DiplomaticRelations, New York 1976.
 
7.
DzU Nr 48 z 1985 r., poz. 245.
 
8.
DzU Nr 13 z 1982 r., poz. 98.
 
9.
R. Higgins, UK Foreign Affairs Committee Report on the Abuse of Diplomatic Immunitiesand Privileges: Government Response and Report, “American Journal of InternationalLaw”, Vol. 80, No. 1/1986.
 
10.
L.T. Lee, Consular Law and Practice, 2nd ed., Oxford 1991.
 
11.
Ch.M. Nelson, “Opening” Pandora’s Box: Te Status of Diplomatic Bag in InternationalRelations, “Fordham International Law Journal”, vol. 12/1989.
 
12.
Status poczty dyplomatycznej. Studium prawnomiędzynarodowe, Warszawa 2003.
 
13.
J. Sutor, Status kuriera i poczty dyplomatycznej, „Nowe Prawo”, 4/1987.
 
14.
“ILC Yearbook” 1957, vol. I.
 
15.
“ILC Yearbook” 1957, vol. II.
 
16.
„ILC Yearbook” 1982, vol. II, część I.
 
17.
„ILC Yearbook” 1983, vol. II, część I.
 
18.
“ILC Yearbook” 1984, vol. II, część II.
 
19.
“ILC Yearbook” 1988, vol. II, część I.
 
20.
„ILC Yearbook” 1986, vol. I.
 
21.
„ILC Yearbook” 1988, vol. I.
 
22.
„ILC Yearbook” 1988, vol. II, część 1.
 
23.
„ILC Yearbook” 1989, vol. I.
 
24.
„ILC Yearbook” 1989, vol. II, część II.
 
25.
“Yearbook of International Law Commission” (dalej jako „ILC Yearbook”) 1989,vol. II, część 2.
 
ISSN:2082-2677
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top