Review process

The submitted article is subjected to formal evaluation and, after initial acceptance, it is submitted for substantive evaluation (review), which lasts up to 4 weeks. There must be no conflict of interest when selecting a reviewer. The following is considered to be such:
  • direct personal relationships (kinship, legal relationships, conflict);
  • relationships of professional subordination;
  • direct scientific cooperation in the last two years preceding the preparation of the review.
  • The author may provide the name of the potential reviewer, but the Editors reserve the right to decide on their selection. The review has written form and ends with an unequivocal conclusion as to the admission of the article for publication, the possibility of its correction or rejection. The correction or correction of the text should be made immediately, but not longer than within one week. Then the editorial board decides about the further fate of the work. The editorial decision is final. The names of reviewers of individual publications/issues are not disclosed. Once a year, the journal publishes list of collaborating reviewers.
    Journals System - logo
    Scroll to top