PL EN
REVIEW PAPER
WILL THE GREAT GEOCULTURAL CHANGE THREAT BY WAR?
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna im. Jarosława Dąbrowskiego w Warszawie
 
 
Publication date: 2016-11-07
 
 
SBN 2016;10(2): 231-248
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The thesis that in well-established democracies the risk of riots is lower than in immature democracies is losing importance. Also, not every revolution is a step towards democracy. Governments are exposed to street sentence due to the lack of strong civil society institutions and other mechanisms to channel social discontent. In the second decade of the 21st century, the international order also found itself in a crisis of political, economic, military and cultural balance. The decomposition of global, regional and sub-regional security takes place as a result of the crisis of the centroliberal geoculture, the shrinkage of the reproductive abilities of the "welfare state"; manifestations of neighborly imperialisms, gloomy visions of self-perpetuating and self-accelerating violence: the threat of border wars and civil wars, and the re-creation of imperial capabilities by the Russian Federation to incorporate the "russkowo mira civilization". The opponent / enemy becomes both a political actor (individual, group, state and non-state), and a political and social phenomenon on a religious or ethnic basis. In the second decade of the 21st century, it is difficult to model the future of the global geocultural system. After the loss of social trust in the doctrines: liberal, neoliberal, socialist, social-democratic and conservative opinion-forming elites, a renaissance of populist and authoritarian ideas is observed.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Bernstein P., Putin’s Russia and US Defence Strategy, National Defence University(NDU), Institute for National Studies (INSS), Washington DC, 2015.
 
2.
Bartow J.P., Deklaracja Niepodległości Cyberprzestrzeni, „Przegląd Filozoficzno-Literacki”nr 1/2009.
 
3.
Carter A., Submitted statement – Senate appropriations Committee-Defence (FY 2017budget request), Département de la Defence des États-Unis, 2016.
 
4.
Carter A.,, Submitted statement – Senate appropriations Committee-Defence (FY 2017budget request), Département de la Defence des États-Unis, 2016.
 
5.
Departament of Defence, Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorites for 21st CenturyDefence, Washington January 2013.
 
6.
Dueck C., The Obama Doctrina: American Grand Stategy Today, Oxford UniversityPress, New York 2015.
 
7.
Foucault M., Bezpieczeństwo – terytorium – populacja, PWN, Warszawa 2010.
 
8.
Gadamer H., Dziedzictwo Europy, Warszawa 1992. 9 Goldberg A., Obama Doctrine, „The Atlantic”, April 2016.
 
9.
listopada 2016.
 
10.
Grand C., La dissuasion nucléiare et l`Alliance du XXIe siècle, „NATO Review”, 4 june2016.
 
11.
Hardt M., Negri A., Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, New York2004.
 
12.
Harris O., Switzer T., Leading From Behind: Third Time a Chram, „The AmericanInterest”, vol. III, Nr 5/2013.
 
13.
Komunikat ze szczytu NATO w Warszawie, NATO, Warszawa 9 lipca 2016.
 
14.
Mattelaer A., The NATO Warsaw summie: How to strengthen Alliance cohesion, StrategicForum, NDU-INSS, 2016.
 
15.
Rapport du Group d’experts gouvermentaux chargé d`examiner Les progres de la téléinformatiquedans Le contexte de la sécurité International, ONZ, New York 2013.
 
16.
Rasmussen M.V., Militaryzacja Europy Północnej, „Geopolitical Intelligence Services,
 
17.
Rid Th., Cyber War Will Not take place, Oxford – New York, Oxford University Press2013.
 
18.
Schmid A., The Estonia Cyberattaks, [w:] J. Healer (eds.), A Fierce Domain: conflicts incyberspace 1986 to 2012, Cyber Confkict Studiem Association, Wien 2013.
 
19.
Schmitt C., Teologia polityczna. Cztery rozdziały poświęcone nauce o suwerenności,[w:] idem, Teologia polityczna i inne pisma, Kraków 2000.
 
20.
Schmitt M.N.(esd.), Tallin Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare,Cambridge – New York, Cambridge University Press 2013.
 
21.
Sinaï A., Zmiany klimatyczne podsycają konflikty, „Le Monde Diplomatique”, Nr/2015.
 
22.
SIPRI Arms Tranfers Database 2011-2015, 2016.
 
23.
SIPRI Yearbook 2015: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, Oxford,Oxford University Press, 2015.
 
24.
Stephenson P., Investigating Computer-Related Crime: A Handbook for Corporate Investigators,London−New York, CRS Press 1999.
 
25.
Tinder G., Myślenie polityczne. Odwieczne pytania, Warszawa 2003.
 
26.
U.S. Cyber Command – U.S. Strategic Command , www.stracom.mil
 
27.
Wallerstein I., Collins R., Man M., Derluguian G., Calhoun C., Czy kapitalizmma przyszłość, Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog, Warszawa 2015.
 
ISSN:2082-2677
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top