PL EN
REVIEW PAPER
PUBLIC–PRIVATE COOPERATION IN EUROPEAN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTERACTING TERRORISM FINANCING REGULATIONS – CHALLENGES FOR FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Warszawski
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-13
 
 
SBN 2019;15(1): 385-404
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the article is to critically analyze EU regulations on counteracting money laundering and terrorist financing, with particular emphasis on their preventive aspect, introduced mainly through the implementation of the risk-based approach. The basis for effective activities in the described matter is the maximization of the direct involvement of the private sector and private-public cooperation. However, it should be borne in mind that the involvement of private entities carries many risks, related primarily to the possibility of inconsistencies between the provisions of the AML and fundamental freedoms and rights. Therefore, the article emphasizes the analysis of the impact of regulations on counteracting money laundering and terrorist financing on fundamental freedoms and rights, with particular emphasis on the freedom to provide services and the right to a fair trial.
 
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Bergstrom M., Helgesson Svedberg K., Mörth U., A New Role for For‐Profit Actors? The Case of Anti-Money Laundering and Risk Management, „Journal of Common Market Studies”, Nr 49, 2011 r.
 
2.
Bodnar A., Ploszka A. (red.), Wpływ Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka na funkcjonowanie biznesu, Warszawa 2016.
 
3.
Borlini L., Regulating Criminal Finance in the EU in the Light of the International Instruments, „Yearbook of European Law”, Nr 36, 2017 r.
 
4.
FATF, Guidance on the risk-based approach to combating money laundering and terrorist financing, Paryż, 2007 r.
 
5.
FATF, RBA Guidance for Dealers in Precious Metal and Stones, Paryż 2008.
 
6.
Garland D., The Limits of Sovereign State, „British Journal of Criminology”, Nr 36, 1996 r.
 
7.
Kapica W. (red.), Przeciwdziałanie praniu pieniędzy oraz finansowaniu terroryzmu. Praktyczny przewodnik, Warszawa 2019.
 
8.
Luchtman M., van der Ministres R., Cases C – 305/05, Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone et al. v. Conseil des Ministres, judgement of the Court of Justice of 26 June 2007, Grand Chamber [2007] ECR I-5305, „Common Market Law Review”, Nr 46, 2009 r.
 
9.
Mitsilegas V., Vavoula N., The Evolving EU Anti-Money Laundering Regime: Challenges for Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law, „Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law”, Nr 23, 2016 r.
 
10.
Mörth U., European Public-Private Collaboration: A Choice Between Efficiency and Democratic Accountability?, 2008 r.
 
11.
Mörth U., The Market Turn in EU Governance – The Emergence of Public–Private Collaboration, Governance, Nr 22, 2009 r.
 
12.
Pływaczewski E., Przeciwdziałanie praniu brudnych pieniędzy z perspektywy międzynarodowej, „Państwo i Prawo”, Nr 8, 2002 r.
 
13.
Siejczuk P., Problematyka prania brudnych pieniędzy w regulacjach prawnomiędzynarodowych, europejskich i krajowych, „Bezpieczeństwo Narodowe”, Nr 23-24, 2012 r.
 
14.
Zawidzka-Łojek A., Grzeszczak R. (red.), Prawo materialne Unii Europejskiej. Vademecum, Warszawa 2015.
 
ISSN:2082-2677
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top