PL EN
REVIEW PAPER
THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES (ENMOD) — ISSUES AND RELEVANCE ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN CONFLICT
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
 
 
Submission date: 2024-06-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-07-11
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-07-11
 
 
Publication date: 2024-07-11
 
 
Corresponding author
Kamil Wojciech WOJNOWSKI   

Uniwersytet Warszawski, Polska
 
 
SBN 2024;34(4): 45-56
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The natural environment has always been a ‘silent victim’ of war in the history of armed conflict, as a result of both direct and indirect damage caused by warfare. It was not until the 1970s, as a result of the experience of the Vietnam War in the context of the use of defoliants and herbicides and an increased awareness of environmental security among members of the international community. The first provisions under international humanitarian law protecting the environment were established. In view of this, the aim of this article is to analyse one of the most important international agreements on the subject, the Convention on the Prohibition of the Military or Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD). The purpose of this article is to demonstrate why the above convention was created in the 1970s and not in another decade. At the same time, by analysing the most significant articles of ENMOD, the aim is to identify the key problems of the convention in relation to the Russian- -Ukrainian armed conflict. Therefore, the main research issue is the relevance of the discussed ENMOD international agreement for environmental protection in a situation of armed conflict, taking the example of the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war. The stated research hypothesis is that the ENMOD Convention is not relevant to the vast majority of environmental damage caused by armed conflict. Nevertheless, it is a key treaty that complements the general and specific regimes of environmental protection in situations of armed conflict. For the purpose of solving the research issue posed and verification the hypothesis, the article applies a methodology based on a qualitative method, analysing and critically evaluating the literature on the subject, while using a dogmatic-legal method on the legal sciences in relation to legal acts and a historical-legal method to show the genesis and evolution of the ENMOD Convention. The author concludes in the analysis that the ENMOD is not relevant for most environmental damage caused by armed action, as evidenced by the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict, where both parties to the conflict are bound by this treaty. However, the ENMOD is an important addition to the environmental protection regime in a situation of armed conflict.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Austin, J. E., Bruch, C. E., 2000. The Environmental Consequences of War. Legal, Economic, and Scientific Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
2.
Best, G., 1997. War and Law since 1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press Publication.
 
3.
Bouvier, A., 1992. Recent studies on the protection of the environment in time of armed conflict. International Review of the Red Cross (1961-1997), 32 (291), 562-564.
 
4.
Demeyere, B., Ruys T., 2016. Means and Methods of Warfare. W: J. Wouters, P. De Man i N. Verlinden, red. Armed Conflicts and the Law. Cambridge: Intersentia, 329-331.
 
5.
Dinstein, Y., 2022. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
6.
Fleck, D., 2008. The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
7.
Halpern, M., 2015. Protecting Vulnerable Environments in Armed Conflict: Deficiencies in International Humanitarian Law. Stanford Journal of International Law, 51 (2), 129-130.
 
8.
Hersh, S. M., 1972. Rainmaking Is Used As Weapon by U.S. The New York Times, 3 July, s. 1.
 
9.
International Committee of the Red Cross, 2020. Guidelines on the protection of the natural environment in armed conflict. Rules and recommendations relating to the protection of the natural environment under international humanitarian law, with commentary [online]. International Committee of the Red Cross. Dostępne pod adresem: https://www.icrc.org/en/public...- conflict, [dostęp: 14 czerwca 2024].
 
10.
Janusz-Pawletta, B. 2012. Międzynarodowe prawo humanitarne konfliktów zbrojnych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Obrony Narodowej.
 
11.
Kenig-Witkowska, M. M., 2011. Międzynarodowe prawo środowiska. Wybrane zagadnienia systemowe. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
 
12.
Konwencja o zakazie używania technicznych środków oddziaływania na środowisko w celach militarnych lub jakichkolwiek innych celach wrogich, otwarta do podpisania w Genewie dnia 18 maja 1977 roku (Dz. U. z 1978 roku Nr 31, poz. 132).
 
13.
Mamedov, G., 2023. Is blowing up of Kakhovka HPP basis for new warrant from International Criminal Court? [online]. Ukrainska Pravda. Dostępne pod adresem: https:// www.pravda.com.ua/eng/columns/2023/06/6/7405627/ [dostęp: 14 czerwca 2024].
 
14.
Marcinko, M., Łubiński, P., 2009. Wybrane zagadnienia z zakresu międzynarodowego prawa humanitarnego. Kraków: Szkoła Aspirantów Państwowej Straży Pożarnej.
 
15.
Protokoły Dodatkowe dotyczący ochrony ofiar międzynarodowych konfliktów zbrojnych (Protokół I) oraz dotyczący ochrony ofiar niemiędzynarodowych konfliktów zbrojnych (Protokół II), sporządzone w Genewie z dnia 8 czerwca 1977 roku (Dz. U. z 1992 roku Nr 41, poz. 175 z późn. zm.).
 
16.
Payne, C. R., 2020. Protection of the Natural Environment. W: D. Akande i B. Saul, red. Oxford Guide to International Humanitarian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 222-225.
 
17.
Reyhani, R., 2006. Protection of the Environment During Armed Conflict. Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review, 14 (2), 325-327.
 
18.
Schmitt, M. N., 1997. Green War: An Assessment of the Environmental Law of International Armed Conflict. Yale Journal of International Law, 17, 82-85.
 
19.
Szpak, A., 2014. Międzynarodowe prawo humanitarne. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
 
20.
United Nations, 1972. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment [online]. International Maritime Organization. Dostępne pod adresem: https:// wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/ConferencesMeetings/Documents/ A%20CONF.48%2014%20Rev.1.pdf, [dostęp: 13 czerwca 2024].
 
21.
United Nations, 1976. Report of the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament, Volume I [online]. UN Official Document System. Dostępne pod adresem: https:// documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/ng9/059/31/pdf/ng905931.pdf?token=OYNsYVv3cg9yATNoRM& fe=true, [dostęp: 14 czerwca 2024].
 
22.
United Nations Environment Programme, 2009. Protecting the Environment During Armed Conflict An Inventory and Analysis of International Law [online]. UN Environment Programme. Dostępne pod adresem: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstr... /20.500.11822/7813/-Protecting%20the%20Environment%20During%20Armed%20 Conflict_An%20Inventory%20and%20Analysis%20of%20International%20Law- 2009891.pdf?sequence=3&%3BisAllowed=, [dostęp: 13 czerwca 2024].
 
23.
Wilk A., Żochowski P., Ber J., 2023. Wysadzenie tamy na Dnieprze w Nowej Kachowce. 467. dzień wojny [online], Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich, Dostępne pod adresem: https:// www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2023-06-06/wysadzenie-tamy-na-dnieprze-wnowej- kachowce-467-dzien-wojny, [dostęp: 24 sierpnia 2023].
 
ISSN:2082-2677
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top