PL EN
 
PL EN
Latest Issue
Archive
About the Journal
For Authors
For Reviewers
2/2017 vol. 12
Stats
CC BY-SA 4.0
Get citation
REVIEW PAPER
CONFLICT SITUATIONS REPRESENTED BY SIMPLE GRAPHICS
Janusz Andrzej POMYKAŁA 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna im. Jarosława Dąbrowskiego w Warszawie
 
 
Publication date: 2017-12-01
 
 
SBN 2017;12(2): 379-394
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37055/sbn/129873
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (25)
 
KEYWORDS
information systems
conflicts
simple graphs
trees
terrorist threat
cyber crime
information warfare
 
ABSTRACT
At work, I consider the classification of conflict situations with the use of simple graphs. The motivation for the proposed approach is the need to design and build anti-terrorist systems and agencies taking into account new types of threats. The aim is also to anticipate future conflicts in Europe and elsewhere. Conflict prevention is also an important task of theory. The obtained results can be regarded as the beginning of building a model of social conflicts.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Artymiak R., Wojny i konflikty w XX wieku.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Barber D., Machine learning, Cambridge Press, 2014.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Harary F., Graph theory, Wesley, 1969.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Harary F., On the notion of balance of a signed graph, Michigan math. J. 1954.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Heider F., Attitudes and cognitive organization, J. of Psych. 21, 1946, 107-112.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Hildegarda z Bingen, Antychryst i koniec świata, 2012, Wyd. Benedyktynów TYNIEC.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Hołyst B., Goca M., Terroryzm w poglądach społeczeństwa polskiego, Warszawa 2011, WSM.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Hołyst B., Terroryzm, Warszawa 2011, wyd. 2, Lexis Nexis.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Kaczyński J., Polska naszych marzeń, Akapit 2011, Lublin.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Kaczyński J., Porozumienie przeciw monowładzy, wyd. Zysk i s-ka, 2016.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Knuth D.T., The art of computer programing, vol. 4, Addison Wesley.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Knuth D.T., The art of computer programming, vol. 4. Addison Wesley.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Pawlak Z., Anatomy of Conflicts, ICS Research Report 11/92.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Pawlak Z., Rough sets, North Holland, 1990.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Pomykała J.A., O teorii konfliktów i jej jednym zastosowaniu w polityce, [w:] Społeczeństwopolskie w drugiej dekadzie XXI wieku, red. dr Małgorzata Such-Pyrgiel, dr Kateryna Novikowa,Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Gospodarki Euroregionalnej w Józefowie, 2016, monografiapokonferencyjna.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Pomykała J.A., On similarity based approximation of information, Demonstratio Mathematica,vol. XXVII, No 3-4, 1994.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Pomykała J.A., Systemy informacyjne. Skrypt dla studentów, ERP., Warszawa 2015.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Roberts F.S., Discrete mathematical models, 1976, Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Ross K., Wright C., Matematyka dyskretna, PWN, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Salejko-Szyszczak I., Klasyfikacja konfliktów w przedsiębiorstwie, Acta Universitatis NicolaiCopernici, Zarządzanie XXXVIII-Zeszyt 404-Toruń 2011.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Skowron A., Rauszer C., The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems, in:R. Słowiński (ed.), Intelligent decision support, Handbook of applications and advances of RoughSets Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht , North Holland, 1991.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Tadelis S., Game theory. An introduction, NY 2016.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Wilson R.J., Watkins J.J., Graphs. Wiley, 1990.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Wolniewicz B., Ontologia sytuacji, PWN, 1985.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Żakowski W., Sequences of Information Systems Configurations and Conflicts, ICS 32/92.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
ISSN:2082-2677
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top